<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wagner Danda Weblog &#187; SSD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wagnerdanda.me/tag/ssd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wagnerdanda.me</link>
	<description>.NET, OpenSource, Web 2.0 and other projects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 04:28:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How to fix Google Chrome problems with SSD &#8211; move cache to ramdisk</title>
		<link>http://www.wagnerdanda.me/2010/08/how-to-fix-google-chrome-problems-with-ssd-move-cache-to-ramdisk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wagnerdanda.me/2010/08/how-to-fix-google-chrome-problems-with-ssd-move-cache-to-ramdisk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wagner Danda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssd problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stuttering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wagnerdanda.me/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you've experienced SSD stuttering while using Google Chrome, you're not alone. Here is the quick solution: change Chrome's cache directory to another location using the following startup parameters: "...chrome.exe" --disk-cache-dir=<CACHE_DIR> --disk-cache-size=<SIZE_IN_BYTES>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ve experienced <strong>SSD stuttering</strong> while using Google Chrome, you&#8217;re not alone. Here is the quick solution: change Chrome&#8217;s cache directory to another location (i.e. non-ssd harddrive, <a href="http://www.mydigitallife.info/2007/05/27/free-ramdisk-for-windows-vista-xp-2000-and-2003-server/">ramdisk</a>)!</p>
<p>So, how can I do this? <strong>It&#8217;s simple, you can </strong><strong>tweak Chrome with the following startup parameters:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">&#8220;&#8230;chrome.exe&#8221; </span><strong>&#8211;disk-cache-dir=<em><span style="font-weight: normal;">&lt;CACHE_DIR&gt;</span></em> &#8211;disk-cache-size=<em><span style="font-weight: normal;">&lt;SIZE_IN_BYTES&gt;</span></em></strong></strong></li>
</ul>
<p>Here is an example, pointing to a ramdisk drive (T:) and allocating a max of 500MB to it (which is nice to be able to control when you&#8217;re using ramdisk):</p>
<ul>
<li>chrome.exe<strong> &#8211;disk-cache-dir=</strong>T:\ChromeCache<strong> &#8211;disk-cache-size=</strong>524288000</li>
</ul>
<p>Here is a discussion post about these new parameters for more info:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Chrome/thread?tid=098d42a41aacdc6d&amp;hl=en">Needed Feature: Cache Size/Location</a></li>
</ul>
<p>So far this has worked great for me, much better than reallocating the whole home dir using symlinks, junctions and the <strong>&#8211;user-data-dir</strong> parameter . If you still want to do this, follow these examples:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDVbdU9rbTY">How To Relocate Google Chrome Cache Folder To Data Disk Partition?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Chrome/thread?tid=311f28c02423b1af&amp;hl=en">Google Chrome Locks up slightly with SSD Drives &#8211; Google Chrome Help</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wagnerdanda.me/2010/08/how-to-fix-google-chrome-problems-with-ssd-move-cache-to-ramdisk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Optimizing Ubuntu Linux to minimize possible SSD problems</title>
		<link>http://www.wagnerdanda.me/2009/12/optimizing-ubuntu-linux-to-minimize-possible-ssd-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wagnerdanda.me/2009/12/optimizing-ubuntu-linux-to-minimize-possible-ssd-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wagner Danda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux / Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noatime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nodiratime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wagnerdanda.me/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are other tips on optimizing your Ubuntu Linux to minimize possible SSD problems. I still have some concerns about SSD stuttering and limited life-span, but I hope that following the instructions below I will minimize these problems:

Using noatime and nodiratime

UUID=da949f54-f6a5-4dd3-a293-8b2925834baf /               ext4    noatime,nodiratime,errors=remount-ro0       1

Setting up ramdisk on heavily used temp folder:

tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0
tmpfs /media/ramdisk [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are other tips on optimizing your Ubuntu Linux to minimize possible SSD problems. I still have some concerns about SSD stuttering and limited life-span, but I hope that following the instructions below I will minimize these problems:</p>
<ul>
<li>Using <strong>noatime</strong> and <strong>nodiratime</strong></li>
</ul>
<blockquote><p>UUID=da949f54-f6a5-4dd3-a293-8b2925834baf /               ext4    noatime,nodiratime,errors=remount-ro0       1</p></blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Setting up ramdisk on heavily used temp folder:</li>
</ul>
<blockquote><p>tmpfs /tmp tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0<br />
tmpfs /media/ramdisk tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0<br />
tmpfs /var/run tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0<br />
tmpfs /var/lock tmpfs defaults,noatime,mode=1777 0 0</p></blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Changing I/O Schedule to &#8220;deadline&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=54379">http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=54379</a></p>
<p>So far, no problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wagnerdanda.me/2009/12/optimizing-ubuntu-linux-to-minimize-possible-ssd-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First impressions: Solid State Drive (SSD) vs 7500 rpm HDD</title>
		<link>http://www.wagnerdanda.me/2009/11/my-first-impressons-on-solid-state-drive-ssd-vs-7500-rpm-hdd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wagnerdanda.me/2009/11/my-first-impressons-on-solid-state-drive-ssd-vs-7500-rpm-hdd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wagner Danda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux / Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7500 rpm hdd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hdd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid state drive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wagnerdanda.me/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, my first impressions on SSD? It&#8217;s damn fast!  Let me say that again, IT&#8217;S DAMN FAST!
Seriously, I&#8217;m talking about at least 10x faster&#8230; Check it out:

Boot time on Ubuntu 9.10 (disregarding BIOS initial checkup time)

7500 rpm HDD:  ~160 sec
OCZ Solid Series 60GB  SSD: ~20 sec; (what?! yes, your read correctly)




Copying Files (ex: typical video [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, my first impressions on SSD? It&#8217;s damn fast!  Let me say that again, <strong>IT&#8217;S DAMN FAST</strong>!</p>
<p>Seriously, I&#8217;m talking about at least 10x faster&#8230; Check it out:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Boot time</strong> on Ubuntu 9.10 (disregarding BIOS initial checkup time)
<ul>
<li>7500 rpm HDD:  ~160 sec</li>
<li>OCZ Solid Series 60GB  SSD: <strong>~20 sec;</strong> (what?! yes, your read correctly)</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Copying Files</strong> (ex: typical video of 600 MB)
<ul>
<li>Before, with a &#8220;fast&#8221; 7500 rpm HDD: a lot&#8230; no need to mention, it was pretty lame&#8230; <span style="color: #ff00ff;"> </span></li>
<li>OCZ SSD: <strong>12 seconds!</strong></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Firefox Browsing </strong>/ Overall Impression:
<ul>
<li>Opening tabs, clicking back and other things are now instantaneous with SSD.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Check out this vid to see a guy doing a boot time test on a Ubuntu with SSD: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GKohxZHNg4">Booting Ubuntu 9 04 with SSD</a></p>
<p>Even if you&#8217;re on a budget,you can start with the entry-level OCZ Solid Series&#8230; <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Nowadays you can get one for less than $150 bucks&#8230; </strong>Here is where I got mine:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.canadacomputers.com/index.php?do=ShowProduct&amp;cmd=pd&amp;pid=020610&amp;cid=HDD.859">http://www.canadacomputers.com/index.php?do=ShowProduct&amp;cmd=pd&amp;pid=020610&amp;cid=HDD.859</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Based on some Internet reviews I thought this one would be too slow compared to the other options (i.e. Vertex), but It&#8217;s like comparing a Porsche 911 to a Bugatti Veyron, both are extremely faster than my Honda Civic <img src='http://www.wagnerdanda.me/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Happy shopping! <img src='http://www.wagnerdanda.me/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wagnerdanda.me/2009/11/my-first-impressons-on-solid-state-drive-ssd-vs-7500-rpm-hdd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
